Users Online

· Guests Online: 48

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 188
· Newest Member: meenachowdary055

Forum Threads

Newest Threads
No Threads created
Hottest Threads
No Threads created

Latest Articles

Articles Hierarchy

Isaca- CISA

 

Isaca- CISA

 

 

 

 

Question ID 22440

When performing a review of the structure of an electronic funds transfer (EFT) system, an IS auditor observes that the technological infrastructure is based on a
centralized processing scheme that has been outsourced to a provider in another country. Based on this information, which of the following conclusions should be
the main concern of the IS auditor?

Option A

There could be a question regarding the legal jurisdiction.

Option B

Having a provider abroad will cause excessive costs in future audits.

Option C

The auditing process will be difficult because of the distance.

Option D

There could be different auditing norms.

Correct Answer A
Description Explanation: In the funds transfer process, when the processing scheme is centralized in a different country, there could be legal issues of jurisdiction that might affect the right to perform a review in the other country. The other choices, though possible, are not as relevant as the issue of legal jurisdiction.
Update Date and Time 2018-03-26 05:02:55

 

Question ID 22441

An IS auditor should expect which of the following items to be included in the request for proposal (RFP) when IS is procuring services from an independent service
provider (ISP)?

Option A

References from other customers

Option B

Service level agreement (SLA) template

Option C

Maintenance agreement

Option D

Conversion plan

Correct Answer A
Description An IS auditor should look for an independent verification that the ISP can perform the tasks being contracted for. References from other customers would provide an independent, external review and verification of procedures and processes the ISP follows-issues which would be of concern to an IS auditor. Checking references is a means of obtaining an independent verification that the vendor can perform the services it says it can. A maintenance agreement relates more to equipment than to services, and a conversion plan, while important, is less important than verification that the ISP can provide the services they propose.
Update Date and Time 2018-03-26 05:03:51

 

Comments

No Comments have been Posted.

Post Comment

Please Login to Post a Comment.

Ratings

Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Render time: 0.78 seconds
10,843,137 unique visits